|
|||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||
| Eclipse Performance Eclipse Performance |
Welcome to the Club4G Forums where you can join fellow owners from all over North America discussing anything related to the 2006+ Mitsubishi Eclipse. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. To gain access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, you must register today!
All of this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account. Sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Vehicle:
2008 Eclipse GT 3.8
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 1
![]() |
Drivetrain losses and dyno charts
I have been looking for all stock dyno charts for the GT AT. I have taken a look at the Dyno Queen Leaderboard topic, and found stock GT with 236-239whp. This is quite similar to mine: 237whp.
If we consider our stated crank power as 263hp, it would mean a <10% drivetrain loss, which is really low if we consider automatic transmission cars usually lose 15-25% do the wheels. Are these dyno numbers wrong in some way... or do we have a really good transmission/drivetrain? Best regards, Ziki
__________________
2008 Eclipse GT AT: Progress anti-sway bar, Tanabe Strut Bar and Low Tie Bar, Injen CAI, Greedy Evo2 Axle Back Exhaust, Megan Racing Coilovers, Energy Suspension bushes and Motor Mounts, Ingall Stiffy, BrianJ Shift Control Module, Powerslot brake rotors, Goodridge brake lines, Hawk Hps brake pads, Toyo R888 |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 629
Rep Power: 3
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
well could be the cars you saw on the board were M/T so smaller loss. also could be that your using a bloated dyno that gives huge number readouts.
but i do remember seeing some charts back in the day when RIPP was dynoing thier stuff and there was a surprisingly small difference between A/T and M/T numbers.... |
|
|
|